PDA

View Full Version : Bad Stuff happening to people that live places...


Texx
05-22-2006, 02:55 PM
Due to the specifics of a few of the last Off-Topic Gems, I thought it was better to be more general so that less people are offended.

So, that guy who did those things was wrong. Those people that thought that stuff was right were actually wrong. And doing that stuff that did things made people feel certain ways about how stuff was going. And the things that happened may not have been that guy's fault, but he should have been doing the stuff he supposed to be doing from the beginning and not waiting until after stuff happened to those people to do things.

How do you feel about that stuff that happened? And please, be general so as not to say stuff that offends people.

Gratitude to them that said stuff.

Him

Big Clips
05-22-2006, 03:30 PM
Thats some crazy stuff.

gertrude
05-23-2006, 08:27 AM
I don't know. Ontologically speaking, if that stuff hadn't happened, I wouldn't be the person I am today. Stuff like that isn't necessarily anyone's fault; Nietzsche always said that time creates our leaders (like that guy who did those things) like rolling hills of monumental peaks and undenyably boring valleys (so like, stuff, and then absense of stuff). Stuff like that just proves Nietszsche's point. The rightness or wrongness of the stuff in question to me is trivial: there's nothing I can do about that stuff, so I figure that stuff was just bound to happen, anyway. It follows, then, that all this stuff could be really the fault of the people that thought that stuff was right but were actually wrong.

Texx
05-23-2006, 08:42 AM
Well, I just think that that guy could have done more stuff to keep the other stuuf from happening to those people. I mean, that guy is supposed to be doing stuff, he take all of the stuff for doing stuff right. He could at least do stuff that would help others out before that bad stuff happens to them. I mean, what's the good of having things that protects people from stuff if that thing isn't actually keeping stuff from happening to people.

And that other guy that did stuff that made that one guy look like he wasn't actualy doing stuff raised some good things. I mean, his things really made me think about the stuff that one guy was doing.

Sure, I can say I'd do stuff that helped people better, but it seems there are alot of things people could do better. Like writing stuff and saying stuff without looking like a thing.

Marxus
05-23-2006, 08:47 AM
I am still not convinced Gertrude. That stuff is entirely the fault of that guy, and to say otherwise makes me question your motives. I bet your one of those people and would do whatever it took to defend that guy. If that thing hadn't happend at the place they were doing that stuff with the things then maybe I could see your point, however it did happen and that stuff that happend to the stuff is unforgivable. its totally his fault!

That guy of all people needs to learn that you cant do that stuff to those things at that place with that level of brazen disregard.

and what about those poor farm animals? shesh... that guy really grinds my gears.

:D

gertrude
05-23-2006, 08:54 AM
Originally posted by Texx
Well, I just think that that guy could have done more stuff to keep the other stuff from happening to those people. I mean, that guy is supposed to be doing stuff, he take all of the stuff for doing stuff right. He could at least do stuff that would help others out before that bad stuff happens to them. I mean, what's the good of having things that protects people from stuff if that thing isn't actually keeping stuff from happening to people.


But some time passed and that stuff was necessary, wasn't it? Stuff like that stuff can't be confused with other stuff, right? Some stuff is totally (in a certain way) hard to forget like that guy forgot, but those people that thought that stuff have a total right to their opinion. I agree with you on some of the stuff above; protecting people from stuff should be that guy's number one priority. Perhaps if we could get some subjective stuff muddled together properly, stuff like that wouldn't happen, but surely all that stuff isn't his fault!

Originally posted by Marxus
I am still not convinced Gertrude. That stuff is entirely the fault of that guy, and to say otherwise makes me question your motives. I bet your one of those people and would do whatever it took to defend that guy. If that thing hadn't happend at the place they were doing that stuff with the things then maybe I could see your point, however it did happen and that stuff that happend to the stuff is unforgivable. its totally his fault!

That guy of all people needs to learn that you cant do that stuff to those things at that place with that level of brazen disregard.

and what about those poor farm animals? shesh... that guy really grinds my gears.

:D

I can't believe you would say something like that! I didn't spend five years of my life getting my degree in a liberal discipline to be called "one of those people." Restecpe mah authoratah!


This is a good debate. Mods please don't delete!!!11!

.....
...
..

:rolleyes:

Texx
05-23-2006, 01:41 PM
Originally posted by gertrude


I can't believe you would say something like that! I didn't spend five years of my life getting my degree in a liberal discipline to be called "one of those people."



You guys are getting specific, here. It's best to generalize so as to not offend.

"I didn't spend five years of my life getting my degree in a liberal discepline to be called "one of those people."

Would be

in"I didn't spend time getting my thing in stuff to be called one of them."


See, totally non-offensive to everyone - "They will not get mad at this stuff."

Remember, the devil is in the details. Therefore, one would assume that generalizing is devine.

For example, one would confess the following:

"I have done something for which I am ashamed."

When someone asks for specifics, they are asking you to reveal information which may upset them.

The answer to "Could you be more specific" would be "Yes, I could."

Specific information is therefore, incongruous with happiness, and therefore, inflamatory in nature.

Marxus
05-23-2006, 02:27 PM
Originally posted by gertrude
I can't believe you would say something like that! I didn't spend five years of my life getting my degree in a liberal discipline to be called "one of those people." Restecpe mah authoratah!


By "those people" I really meant "Those people" not the "those people" you are refering to! shesh, I would not disrespect "those people" I mean geez, I thought I was clear as mud here on the topic of this stuff and things that happend that one time with the other stuff...

I mean, that is what were talking about right? the thing with the stuff and that guy?

Wow, backpedaling in a conversation about nothing ... I fear we are treading into uncharted waters here. :p

Glaeken
05-23-2006, 10:58 PM
Hey Texx,
I didn't thank you for the thing with the guy in the place.
I'll always appreciate that stuff.

Thanks,
Glaeken;)

Texx
05-24-2006, 02:21 PM
No problem, Glaeken. I was just thinking about the time I had that stuff from that place that served good stuff, that one time. Man, am I glad that stuff had that thing, otherwise I would have been out alot more things.

Him

Son of Liberty
05-29-2006, 09:10 PM
.....dehh....:confused: